Journal profile

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques

Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
ISSN1530-4515 | 1051-7200 | 1534-4908 FormatPrint StatusCurrently indexed

Journal Citation Impact

Estimated influence, citation density, publishing volume, and citation integrity from the analytics table.

Impact Factor
2.92
Citation rate 1.72 346 total citations
h5-index 16 h5 depth signal
Cited share 66.4% 142 of 214
Total citations 346 Citation footprint
Metric signal 1.58 External metric anchor
Self-citation 1.4% 5 self-citations

Citations Trend

Monthly Publications Cadence

Citing Geographic Demographics

China 339
United States 173
Turkey 152
Japan 147
Italy 84

Citing Fields of Research

Abdominal Surgery 839
Digestive Disorders 568
Liver & Colon Cancer 262
Liver Diseases 104
Anesthetic & Pain Medicine 83

Publishing Activity & Reach

Volume, recency, access pattern, and citing-community signals from the journal analytics record.

All-time article footprint 4,075 Articles tracked across the journal lifetime
Indexed publication set 214 142 cited publications
Last 12 months 104 8.7 publications/month
Open access share 5.8% 6 OA publications in the last year
Leading citing country China 339 citing publications
Leading citing field Abdominal Surgery 839 citing publications
Latest tracked publication 12 October 2026 10 recent records available

Coverage & Indexing History

MEDLINE
v9n2, Apr. 1999-
PubMed
v9n2, Apr. 1999-
Index medicus
Active Coverage

Research Focus & Classification

Indexed Subjects

Abdominal Surgery Digestive Disorders

Broad Categories

Diagnostic Imaging Gastroenterology General Surgery Digestive Disorders

MeSH Descriptors

Endoscopy Laparoscopy

Latest Publications

Recent article records with DOI-first linking and condensed abstracts.

01
Raul Sebastian, Oscar Tuesta, Adrian Riva et al.
Background: Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery has expanded rapidly, but its advantages over conventional laparoscopy remain uncertain. Methods: We compared 30-day outcomes after robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Ro...
03
Shijie Hu, Yan Xia, Jinxin Sheng et al.
Background: Accurate preoperative prediction of surgical difficulty in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) remains challenging, as models for multiport surgery are not directly applicable. Methods: This retrospective sing...
06
Konstantinos P. Economopoulos, Deanna L. Palenzuela Rothman, Elan Witkowski et al.
Background: POEM has been shown to have excellent safety and efficacy in adults. We report our experience with the POEM for the treatment of achalasia in elderly patients (65 y or older). Methods: This is a single-institution retrospecti...
08
Jianmin Zhang, Qingsong Tao, Linsen Zhou et al.
Background: Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) has become one of the standard surgical procedures for early and advanced gastric cancer. The Roux-en-Y reconstruction is the most commonly used method after TLDG to effectively ...
09
Gustavo L. Carvalho, Ioram S. Sette, Eduardo Moreno Paquentin
Background: Bile duct injury is the most feared complication of cholecystectomy: more common than high-income registries suggest, catastrophic and lasting. The robot did not invent this danger; it revived an old one. Its adoption is outp...
10
Zhenlin Chen, Xin Lin, Zhaojie Ruan
Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal resection is often confirmed between postoperative days (PODs) 4 and 8. We evaluated whether the POD1-to-3 platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) “rising slope” in routine blood counts pr...

Bibliographical & Catalog Notes

Title from cover.

Print issues ceased with v. 30 (2020).

Also issued online.