Impact Factor
2.93
Journal Citation Impact
Estimated influence, citation density, publishing volume, and citation integrity from the analytics table.
Citation rate
1.79
429 total citations
h5-index
24
h5 depth signal
Cited share
51.7%
136 of 263
Total citations
429
Citation footprint
Metric signal
1.39
External metric anchor
Self-citation
2.1%
9 self-citations
Citations Trend
Monthly Publications Cadence
Citing Geographic Demographics
United States
315
United Kingdom
202
Germany
160
Australia
94
Canada
79
Citing Fields of Research
Neurosciences
1,472
Psychiatry & Psychology
573
Linguistics & Language Studies
198
Music
198
Postural Control
111
Publishing Activity & Reach
Volume, recency, access pattern, and citing-community signals from the journal analytics record.
All-time article footprint
5,683
Articles tracked across the journal lifetime
Indexed publication set
263
136 cited publications
Last 12 months
147
12.3 publications/month
Open access share
10.2%
15 OA publications in the last year
Leading citing country
United States
315 citing publications
Leading citing field
Neurosciences
1,472 citing publications
Latest tracked publication
1 November 2026
10 recent records available
Coverage & Indexing History
v1, 1975-
v1, 1975-
Active Coverage
Research Focus & Classification
Indexed Subjects
Neurosciences
Issuing & Sponsoring Bodies
Contributor
American Psychological Association
Broad Categories
Psychology
Neurosciences
MeSH Descriptors
Perception
Latest Publications
Recent article records with DOI-first linking and condensed abstracts.
01
02
DOI 10.1037/xhp0001454
Open DOI
Second-order suppression is not proactive: Evidence from the capture-probe paradigm.
03
DOI 10.1037/xhp0001450
Open DOI
Memorability boosts relational memory beyond item-specific memory.
04
DOI 10.1037/xhp0001445
Open DOI
Distractor probability modulates object-based attentional selection.
05
DOI 10.1037/xhp0001452
Open DOI
The effects of cognitive and perceptual load on inattentional blindness.
Inattentional blindness is often attributed to limited attentional resources. In principle, tasks that are more effortful, those that place greater demands on attention, should result in less noticing of unexpected objects. But that load...
06
07
08
DOI 10.1037/xhp0001460
Open DOI
Memorability under pressure: Memorable images are not resilient to retrieval deadlines.
09
10
DOI 10.1037/xhp0001449
Open DOI
High-level attentional selection results in repulsive biases in face space.
Bibliographical & Catalog Notes
Issues for Feb.-May 1975 called v. 104, no. 1-2 but constitute v. 1, no. 1-2.
Vol. 1, no. 3 called also v. 104, no. 3.
Also issued online.
Supersedes in part Journal of experimental psychology.
Vol. 12, no. 1 (FEB 1986)19890816 Notice published Printed on acid-free paper