Impact Factor
2.71
Journal Citation Impact
Estimated influence, citation density, publishing volume, and citation integrity from the analytics table.
Citation rate
1.65
110 total citations
h5-index
14
h5 depth signal
Cited share
60.3%
41 of 68
Total citations
110
Citation footprint
Metric signal
2.28
External metric anchor
Self-citation
4.5%
5 self-citations
Citations Trend
Monthly Publications Cadence
Citing Geographic Demographics
United States
168
Canada
14
Australia
10
United Kingdom
9
Philippines
8
Citing Fields of Research
Medical Ethics
170
Scientometrics & Research Ethics
20
Art
12
Psychiatry & Psychology
9
Genetics & Genomics
9
Publishing Activity & Reach
Volume, recency, access pattern, and citing-community signals from the journal analytics record.
All-time article footprint
271
Articles tracked across the journal lifetime
Indexed publication set
68
41 cited publications
Last 12 months
33
5.5 publications/month
Open access share
69.7%
23 OA publications in the last year
Leading citing country
United States
168 citing publications
Leading citing field
Medical Ethics
170 citing publications
Latest tracked publication
4 September 2026
10 recent records available
Coverage & Indexing History
v41n1, Jan.-Feb. 2019-
v41n1, Jan.-Feb. 2019-
Research Focus & Classification
Indexed Subjects
Medical Ethics
Issuing & Sponsoring Bodies
Contributor
Hastings Center
Broad Categories
Ethics
Medical Ethics
MeSH Descriptors
Ethics, Research
Human Experimentation
Informed Consent
United States
Latest Publications
Recent article records with DOI-first linking and condensed abstracts.
01
DOI 10.1002/eahr.70038
Open DOI
Issue Information
Cover Sapphire Seas , by Amanda Baldwin, 2025, acrylic and oil on linen, 75 × 60 inches. Courtesy of the artist.
02
DOI 10.1002/eahr.70032
Open DOI
The Subtle Crisis: Public Domain Genomes and the Ethics of Translational Infrastructure
Public domain human genomic resources are infrastructure: tools researchers use to ask basic biological questions whose answers are then translated into products and care. Translational science now asks them to support an expanding set o...
03
DOI 10.1002/eahr.70024
Open DOI
When a Human‐in‐the‐Loop Amplifies the Risk of Misalignment: Considerations for Research Ethics Oversight
Human‐in‐the‐loop (HITL) approaches are commonly proposed to address alignment challenges arising from the use of large language models in research ethics oversight. This paper argues that, paradoxically, a HITL can amplify the risk of m...
04
DOI 10.1002/eahr.70020
Open DOI
IRB Policies on the Inclusion of Pregnant Women in Research
Pregnant women have historically been excluded from clinical research, denying pregnant women the benefits of the societal investment in biomedical research and potential direct benefits from research participation. National and internat...
05
DOI 10.1002/eahr.70018
Open DOI
Perspectives of Researchers and Research Team Members Regarding Their Experience with sIRBs
Our study examines the perspectives of researchers and other research team members who conducted National Institutes of Health (NIH)‐funded studies about their use of a single institutional review board (sIRB) review and onboarding proce...
06
DOI 10.1002/eahr.70017
Open DOI
Digital Deception: Survey Bots and the Ethics of Data Integrity
The rapid growth of artificial intelligence and automated systems has significantly impacted digital survey‐based research, particularly when recruitment is conducted via social media platforms. This case study details the erosion of dat...
07
DOI 10.1002/eahr.70035
Open DOI
Issue Information
Cover A Force Like Gravity #1, Emily Cheng, 14 × 11 inches, flashes on canvas.
08
DOI 10.1002/eahr.70031
Open DOI
Organ Chips and Translational Research: Identifying and Examining New Ethical Issues
Organ chips, also known as organ‐on‐a‐chip devices, tissue chips, or microphysiological systems, have emerged over the last decade as a promising translational technology amidst growing concern about the translational crisis between labo...
09
DOI 10.1002/eahr.70019
Open DOI
Misaligned Expectations: Motivations of Medically Underserved People to Enroll in the All of Us Research Program
It is important to know what motivates people, especially from groups underrepresented in biomedical research, to accept or decline participation in research studies. With this information, engagement strategies, incentives to participat...
10
DOI 10.1002/eahr.70013
Open DOI
Including Research Subjects without Decision‐Making Capacity Only as Last Resort
The aim of this paper is to discuss the ethical and legal justification of the broadly accepted ethical principle that researchers may not include adults without decision‐making capacity to consent to participating in research studies if...
Bibliographical & Catalog Notes
"Published on behalf of the Hastings Center."
Also issued in print.